EverNote vs. OneNote
UPDATE July 2008: Since writing this post in October 2007, some important things have changed on the EverNote side. I’m currently evaluating the EverNote 3 beta and will let you know how things turn out. The original post is below…
Okay, let’s have it out! What tool is best for capturing and organizing notes? For a long time I used nothing but Notepad, plus some hand-crafted AutoHotkey scripts. As I got further into my GTD implementation, I wanted something that fit that methodology better and also integrated well with Microsoft Outlook. By the way, this post probably reeks of Procrastivity, but let’s indulge for a bit.
I canvassed the field multiple multiple times. I installed and uninstalled many a tool on my poor tired laptop, probably making a mess of my registry. There were two tools that I kept coming back to: EverNote and OneNote. Eventually those were the only tools left. For several months I used both tools simultaneously, going back and forth between the two trying to find that one reason that would tip the scales. That one reason never came. Both tools had some great features, and each tool also had several painful shortcomings. To help force the decision, I did what any self-respecting anal-retentive manager would do: I made a list!
The list below represents those features that were important to me for my system along with Low/Medium/High priorities. Where there were major shortcomings, I tried my best to find a work-around as if I had already decided to select that tool and make it work.
|
Feature |
Pri |
EverNote 2.1 |
OneNote 2007 |
| Text Recognition |
H |
Yes, but doesn’t allow you to copy/select text | Yes, and text can be easily extracted |
| Handwriting Recognition (image, not digital ink) |
H |
Yes, but uses a “shotgun” word approach and doesn’t allow you to copy/extract text. | No. |
| Auto Import |
H |
Very nice import of text and images just by dropping to folder. | No. I wish OneNote had this. I even tried some of the currently available “PowerToys” and no such luck. There are some command line tricks you can do, but these are very awkward. |
| PDF Import/ Export |
M |
No, EverNote basically doesn’t handle PDFs. You have to just add a link to the file (as an icon). I got around this somewhat with a Ghostscript command file I wrote to extract JPEGs from the PDF and automatically send them to EverNote. | Yes. You have to install the iFilter from Adobe, but after that you have options to import, export, email, etc. |
| Web Clipping from IE and Firefox |
H |
Yes – fast and accurate with links to original; clip and forget. | Poor – Formats somewhat mangled, Firefox is via 3rd party extension, slow & distracting (you have to watch OneNote open, splash screen and all) |
| Easily create Outlook tasks from Notes |
H |
No, manual process | Yes, very easy to create. Some issues where tasks get out of sync (if you move task to another folder) |
| Send note via email |
L |
Yes, although notes are more of a screen shot (not editable) format | Yes, but included function is weak (sends as OneNote attachment). Can get add-on that sends via PDF. |
| On-Screen editing of notes |
H |
Very limited. Cannot draw or float text over images. When inserting something everything else moves around. | Yes, excellent capability here. Also includes a lot of the standard editing & drawing tools ala Microsoft Word. |
| Easy to learn & use GUI |
M |
I know that scroll tape is their “thing”, but it’s awkward. The notes list is nice for quickly jumping to notes. You can only view one note at a time in full screen, and usually the link/source info is not available in that view. | Editor and layout is very easy if you’re familiar with Office products. The layers of notebooks and sections and tabs and pages feel a bit cluttered. |
| Tagging/ Categories |
M |
Yes, Excellent – ability to tag notes, define rules for automatic tags, and search via tag intersection panel | Very weak and poorly implemented. Only manual tags, no good tag hierarchy. The search function doesn’t filter, instead creates awkward page with copy of tagged items not linked back to original items. |
| Cost |
H |
FREE! As long as you don’t want handwriting recognition (which isn’t ready for primetime anyway) or sync multiple databases. | Fairly expensive… $75 (standard license) on Amazon.com. I saw some better deals on eBay ($55-60) if you’re willing to deal with smaller companies or individuals. Microsoft does, however, offer a free 60-day trial. |
| Built in Search |
H |
Yes, also like the fact that it starts to filter as soon as you type | Yes |
| Support for Desktop Search |
H |
No. Big minus here. No way to quickly get to all that useful data. I think they are adding Google Desktop Search capability in v2.2 however. | Yes – Works well with Windows Desktop Search. Should support Google Desktop Search too but I haven’t tested it. |
| Ability to link to notes from other places |
M |
Yes | Yes |
| Speed |
H |
Generally not an issue – fairly lightweight and fast. Occasional hangs, but pretty rare. | This was a big problem on my Dell Latitude D610. By the time it opened and loaded the page, I almost forgot what I was going to jot down. Not really an issue on my shiny new D630. |
So which one did I finally pick? Well, I broke down and bought a copy of OneNote 2007. One of the biggest reasons was desktop search capability. Even though EverNote has some very nice tagging capability, which trumps filing, search trumps tagging. It’s like rock-paper-scissors but without the circular relationship.
I also started to realize that I wasn’t going to get anything (short of buying a tablet PC) that did highly reliable hand-writing recognition. I was occasionally impressed by that function in EverNote, and I have to give them credit since they are the only ones to have something like this in product, but it’s just not good enough yet to be useful. You can’t extract the text, and if you peek at the XML content, you’ll see what I meant by “shotgun” approach above. For a given hand-written word, any word that is reasonably close gets entered into the database as a match. It’s a one-to-many relationship, so you think it’s working because you get positive hits. When you search on what you expect to match, it matches fairly often. What’s not so obvious at first is that lots of other stuff (incorrect words) will match too. This one-to-many structure is probably why EverNote doesn’t let you copy the recognized text from a hand-written paragraph. There is no cohesive translation per se.
The final nails in the coffin were the editing capability (GUI) and the ability to make synchronized tasks in Outlook with a single click. There are some short-comings to this feature which I will discuss in a future post, but still pretty handy.
So that’s where I am today. It would be great to hear from you as to what tools you prefer and what you think of my assessments. Please post your comments below!
- Manage This! » Blog Archive » Bending OneNote and Outlook to Fit my GTD System
- Manage This! » Blog Archive » OneNote and Outlook Task Synchronization
- Manage This! » Blog Archive » Send PDF Files to EverNote
- Manage This! » Blog Archive » Handwriting Recognition in OneNote 2007? Well, kinda…
- tfp.kz · Организация файлов на рабочем компьютере
- EverNote vs. OneNote « This VS That
- In Search of the Ultimate Digital Notebook | Make The Most
- Getting Started with OneNote to Organise Your Blogging
- 公開懺悔日記 » Evernote vs OneNote
- OneNote 2010 is fast and realibale.
Comments are closed.



October 13, 2007 - 9:47 pm
Hi!
As a user of both Evernote and OneNote 2007, I think you made the right choice. I use Evernote in my job to help keep myself organized and as a place to store all of my phone call logs, significant emails, notes, etc. I throw everything in it and it works very well. However, I would much prefer to use OneNote. I have a copy of OneNote that came in my Office 2007 Home edition and use it at home to keep track of things like my son’s medical issues (meds, dr appt, etc) as well as my own medical issues, financial data, recipes(!), urls, etc. OneNote’s ability to include embedded media and files as well as it’s ease of use throw it over the top for me. The search capability is icing on the cake. OneNote is a fantastic application and one that just blows my mind as to why Microsoft does not promote the heck out of. In case you are wondering, I use Evernote at work since I did not want to purchase another copy of OneNote and my company would not spring for it (I work for a larg utility company…) So I set out looking for a clone and Evernote was the closest thing I found. It is a terrific application and very extensible. There is a nice support community and tons of custom templates. They are both great tools. Hmmm…you would have done well no matter what you picked.
October 13, 2007 - 11:02 pm
George – Thanks for the words of encouragement! I still have a bit of buyer’s remorse, so glad to hear that you agree. I guess the best news for consumers is that there are two very competitive tools battling it out. Both continue to improve and pick up features. It will be interesting to see who comes out on top a year from now.
December 18, 2007 - 4:07 am
I’m new to OneNote and loving it. However, I am having trouble getting it to search and find words in scanned images. No success with scanning my (legible) handwriting but it did scan printed matter just fine and could copy and paste the text…but it couldn’t find any of the words through a search. I’m perplexed as to why it can’t search and find a word in scanned text when it can clearly copy and paste the same text. Any ideas?
December 18, 2007 - 2:05 pm
Pardes,
Sometimes OneNote isn’t set up to search images by default. Try right clicking on the picture/image in OneNote, then select “Make Text in Image Searchable”, then from the sub-menu select the language. As a quick test, I pasted a screen shot of your comments above and was able to search and hit all the words I searched on.
If that doesn’t work, you might be able to get more in depth technical help (or at least report a bug) on the Microsoft OneNote forum. Here is the link.
-Carl
December 31, 2007 - 11:56 pm
Has anyone looked at theBrain.com ?
theBrain comes free with the Personal version and has a good full feature set. I like the inter-connectivity of notes and ideas. The main downside is it does not index and search content that is linked to the file system such as other documents or folders.
I’ve seen in the EverNote forum some users are talking about how it would work well to integrate with the Brain. I mentioned this to the folks at theBrain but have not heard back.
One plus to EverNote, by the way, is that is can be run on other operating systems.
January 1, 2008 - 1:30 pm
Thanks SpiderDog. I did take a look at “The Brain” a while back. It looked interesting at first, but to get the features I would want (search, Outlook integration, multiple file attachments, export capability, etc) it seems I would have to buy the Pro edition. The price tag on that is $249! Outrageous! Even stepping down to the core edition at $149 is still well above my threshold of pain. I didn’t bother downloading the free version since it lacks those key features.
-Carl
February 27, 2008 - 6:12 pm
Hi, I have both and only use evernote (2.2) … my solution with the hand-writing was to purchase the cyberpad from adesso ($150) and import the bitmaps into evernote – works great although my hand writing is very poor.
Philippe
February 27, 2008 - 6:19 pm
PS: would you share your ghostscript script ?
Philippe
February 29, 2008 - 7:25 am
Philippe – Thanks for the tip.
My script simply took PDFs, converted them page by page into JPG format using GhostScript, then auto-imported them into EverNote. I will try to find it and get it posted shortly (in the next week or so).
-Carl
March 14, 2008 - 10:13 pm
Philippe – I just posted the details of the script for sending PDF files to EverNote here. Hope that helps.
-Carl
May 14, 2008 - 4:15 pm
Thanks for the post. However, months after you made this post, in mid-May 2008, Evernote added PDF support.
See http://blog.evernote.com/2008/05/11/evernote-for-mac-just-got-better/
May 17, 2008 - 11:53 am
Interesting article. After reading the list carefully I fully expected evernote to win. In fact, I’d say evernote did win, you simply ignored the results because editing and being connected to outlook was important to you. I despise outlooks, so that’s not a criteria for me.
I chose evernote. The price is great, and as noted, now has pdf support.
May 19, 2008 - 9:28 pm
Al – I heard, that’s great news. Right now I think PDF is only available on the Mac version of EverNote, but reading the forums it should be on the PC client very soon.
Mark – I agree… Each person will put a different priority/value on those rows above. Depending on what’s important to you, you could draw a different conclusion. With PDF support, and with Google Desktop Search support (even more important for me), I may be switching back. I have the EverNote 3 beta installed and am playing with it now.
May 25, 2008 - 9:28 pm
Very interesting review. Thanks very much.
May 30, 2008 - 7:08 am
I’m confused about the windows functionality. Evernote does handle online pdf files but it screws up on local hard drive files. Adding a link to the file gives rise to error code 31 on the first click and crashes evernote with a memory write error the second time I open the link. So it handles http:// urls ok but not file:/// urls.
So at present I can only create a link to the directory and then find the file in it which rather deflates its effectiveness. Or else I just link to online pdfs where they occur and keep downloads as backups.
However there is far better workaround – set up a local webserver and set up a http localost url to the document directory. I’ve just done that with an apache webserver and it works fine!
That’s probably a better solution all around if you are linking to a collection of documents since it means the document urls don’t depend on their absolute location on the hard drive and the links so can be used on a copy of the document directory on any machine and operating system with a local webserver
May 30, 2008 - 7:10 am
Er I may have misunderstood that you were referring to embedded files not links
May 31, 2008 - 9:33 am
Nick – Yes, I was talking about local files, although from the comments above that will soon be fully supported in the new EverNote. Your idea of setting up a local web server is interesting. There are lots of free installs of Apache that run on Windows, such as WAMPServer.
June 7, 2008 - 4:20 pm
Excellent articlet. I too went for OneNote – integration with MS office and Windows Desktop Search, and I too would like handwriting recognition from Logitech IO pen (ie convert to text, not just find all notebook pages) but since neither do this it isn’t an issue.
Comment on TheBrain – I use MindJet and that has a link to OneNote (advantage of using MS software – everyone builds links to it) which creates a mind map of the notebooks.
Keep up the fresh ideas
HugoM
June 13, 2008 - 3:23 pm
Here’s another feature in OneNote: You can record audio while you take notes in real time–and the notes will be linked to the section of audio that was recording while you typed! You can also play back a recording made in OneNote (or anywhere else) and take notes while you listen–again temporally linking the notes to the audio.
I have used this functionality to great effect while doing field research. While other researchers struggle with endless hours of field recordings, I have instant access to any section of audio I want–searchable by keywords I added while listening. In fact, all of my MA research was done in OneNote, making things very easy to move over to Word.
I am totally sick of Microsoft and will soon be switching to a Mac. Unfortunately, this brilliant program will force me to put a copy of XP on my new MBP. I wish something else matched its functionality and searchability.
October 2, 2008 - 3:00 pm
I finally got around to framing the question for myself…found this post…voila! I’m satisfied with the opinions above for guidance. I guess I’ll knuckle down and figure out how to make best use of OneNote. I’ve already got it, I’ve played with it some, I’ll take it to the next level or more.
October 5, 2008 - 1:56 pm
Scott – Glad this was helpful. Some additional tips on OneNote setup and usage can be found in these posts:
Bending OneNote and Outlook to Fit my GTD System
Setting up OneNote 2007 for GTD
DROE Tool (Downloads page)
Handwriting Recognition in OneNote 2007? Well, kinda…
OneNote and Outlook Task Synchronization
-Carl
October 16, 2008 - 4:58 pm
I trialed OneNote ~April, 2008 along with the (at that time) current version of Evernote. At that time, I disliked the “paper tape” approach of EN and preferred the visual of OneNote. But I still wasn’t set to buy ON, b/c everything still seemed kind of kluged together. IE, your desk drawer has several compartments & each compartment contains like items…but that doesn’t mean you can quickly find the item you’re looking for, b/c you still have to look through 40 things to find it.
BUT…about a month ago, I dl’d EN Beta 3.x & am really loving it, eventhough I’ve only scratched the surface of what it can do. One neato thing is that I have a Livescribe pen. When I take some really important notes with the LS pen, I’m then able to add the audio to Evernote, along with a visual of the page, if I like.
I would have to say, in my short time with being “committed” (STS) to EN, I’ve mostly been adding notes. The true test, of course, will most likely be many months from now, when I have the need to actually FIND something quickly! LOL!
October 16, 2008 - 9:09 pm
Susie -
Thanks for your detailed comments! I’ve been using Evernote 3 for the past few months. There are still a few things I’d like to see added, but many of the shortcomings I noted above are now addressed. If I make it to six months, maybe I’ll put my copy of OneNote on eBay
BTW, if you’d like to help kill “the tape”, you can contribute to this post on the Evernote forums.
-Carl
November 27, 2008 - 7:50 am
Your original text and the posts are really useful. I just began using OneNote and was wondering about EverNote. Would you be willing to do an updated version of the original table you made with the features of each of them? I would like to create tasks from the application (still only in OneNote?) but I also need to cut and paste stuff from the Web (OneNote still so lousy at it?). I do like OneNote, because up to now I had a whole bunch of Word files where I was accumulating lots of info – most of it being useless by now. I was wondering if it’s easier sorting out in OneNote or EverNote whatever needs to be deleted, after a while.
Greetings and keep having fun with WhateverNote!
Sacha.
November 28, 2008 - 9:03 pm
Sacha – Thanks for your comments. I hope to get a chance to update the table, not sure when. I can answer some of your questions now… So far, only OneNote can create tasks directly in Outlook, although the synchronization is not as tight as I had hoped (more info in this post). For web clipping, Evernote still wins both in format (what the clipped pages look like) and in the methods available. As far as sorting out what to delete, you could probably accomplish that in either application using tags or by searching on creation/modified dates. Both also allow you to have multiple notebooks, so you could group your content by year.
One advantage that Evernote has is that the team turns versions and adds features much faster than Microsoft. For example, the web synchronization (40 MB/month free) and the PDF support are both major additions since my original blog post.
Hope that helps… and thanks for introducing the term “WhateverNote”
-Carl
December 20, 2008 - 8:50 am
Evernote won’t import onenote files with attachments correctly. This is a huge drawback for me but then I probably need to go do clean-up on my notes anyway. Evernote puts them online for me which is a HUGE plus! That and the ability to save any attachment, view ‘just attachments’, and tagging are probably my main criteria. The new 3.0 version is ‘almost’ there in my opinion. I am making the switch to an online system today!
January 8, 2009 - 1:39 am
Ted – I agree… I had some initial pain porting all of my content from OneNote, but since then it’s been great. I can say that I haven’t opened OneNote or used it in several months. Plus, in addition to having full online access to your notes, Evernote can now handle *any* file type as an attachment. I accidentally discovered this feature a few weeks ago before it unveiled, but they soon after released it as a Premium feature.
February 13, 2009 - 9:29 pm
Thanks Carl this is awesome!
I have been an avid note taker my entire life. I have a lot of detailed info with complex relations. All of my notes have been taken in excel 2007, using many different worksheets for topics and columns for subtopics. I have been stubborn to leave excel but i think its about time. However I really like the ability to sort (largest to smallest, alphabetically) and filter columns in excel. Do either onenote or evernote have this capability?
Also I would really like to know about the importing/exporting capabilities of both if anyone has a moment?
2) Will it be easier to import my excel files into onenote than evernote? (seeing as they are both ms)
3) If I try one of the programs and think it is awful after a while can I export from one to another easier (ie. i think you mentioned that you had difficulty importing onenote notes into evernote? is it easier to import evernote into onenote? making evernote a better choice to start with?
tx jamie
February 13, 2009 - 9:35 pm
god onenote looks so tempting! so easy to relate to!
but everyone seems to be switching to evernote hmmmm…
February 15, 2009 - 9:55 am
Jaime – Thanks for your comments… To answer your first question, Evernote has a note list view that allows you to sort on different columns, filter, etc. That would probably feel the most familiar to you. OneNote uses a different paradigm with notes stored in various notebooks and tabs. You can drag to re-arrange notes, but not quickly sort by columns or filter as in Evernote. The one big feature lacking in Evernote 3.0 (although it has been promised “soon”) is the ability to link to other notes. OneNote does have this capability (and EverNote 2.0 had it).
One your second question, import of Excel files is probably slightly easier in OneNote, but can be done in either. In both cases, you can copy a portion of the sheet and paste it as a table into a note.
It is very hard to move content into OneNote, other than printing to OneNote which results in a bit mapped (non-editable) version of the note. Evernote has made some nice improvements to their OneNote import function, and can also import from Google Notebook. Some of the formatting is changed, but the content comes across.
In the end, you’ll probably be curious enough that you’ll want to try both. I would recommend keeping your Excel setup alive while you test the two with new notes and a small portion of your archive.
Hope that helps!
Carl
February 17, 2009 - 3:45 pm
I just finished “evaluating” both Evernote and OneNote. I decided that both have features the other lacks, and depending on your primary focus, you may be forced to choose one over the other.
Since I am more or less chained to Outlook for mail, contacts, etc., OneNote is better integrated (from an overall GTD point of view), especially where creating/linking tasks, etc. in Outlook is concerned. However . . .
1) OneNote web clipping doesn’t work in Firefox. That nifty feature is only available in IE (yuck!) Evernote is better in this regard.
2) The mobile counterpart to OneNote – OneNote mobile – sucks. Mulitple notebook support is non-existent, and the interface is clumsy. Here again, Evernote is superior.
3) Accessibilty to your notes from a web browser, i.e. in situations when you are not at your own computer or do not have mobile device access, is also non-existent OneNote. Evernote, of course, isn’t limited on this regard, unless you deliberately choose not to sync a notebook to the web.
4) Some of the cool Evernote features that are available on the Mac client are not availabe on the Windows client.
In general, I think Evernote is the superior product, but if you are stuck on a Windows platform, Evernote’s Windows client needs some polishing and will require better integration with MS Office apps. In the end, I opted for OneNote. (sigh)
February 21, 2009 - 12:58 am
tx carl
February 22, 2009 - 2:57 pm
Chris – Great points, thanks for sharing! I would add that the integration between OneNote and Outlook (at least for Outlook 2003) wasn’t as solid as I had hoped. It turns out it is pretty easy to get the tasks out of sync. I posted a description of how this works here.
-Carl
March 4, 2009 - 11:50 pm
I used to use Evernote but have become a OneNote user all the way. It works, and works pretty well.
March 22, 2009 - 6:59 pm
You state that EN allows: Ability to link to notes from other places
I evaulated the newest evernote3 and outlook and don’t see a way to link to do intranotes or to link outside apps to a (deep link) note in EN. This is a deal breaker for me. Have I missed it.
On the ON side, it can link to any paragraph and has a right click “url of paragraph” that you can give to any app to get directly to the page. It is great BUT it does not play well with MS competetors. So using the onenote// protocal url from the web works fine in IE – it opens onenote and gets you to the exact paragraph, in Firefox however ( my browser) the same link only opens onenote but does not deep link you to the exact paragraph. This sucks because I use a FF tasks program that I need those links – outlook is way to slow and bloated for me. Also going the other way – using a gmail url which on the winxp desktop or in a browser address bar would deep link you to the exact gmail message does not work in ON – it only takes you to the inbox ( MS and Google fighting with each other!). This same link gives you the correct deep link in EN.
If there are folks who have figured out solutions to the two ON URL communication issues please let me know(dipaola@gmail.com).
Might move to EN if an update give you interlinking. But actually they worry me as they are going from successful free ( hey now we have enought subscribers – lets screw them now) to pushing that you have to register and by more on the cloud. Look at google notebook users – they are screwed with google pulling it. As evil as MS is – onenote is yours and won’t go away or change with a business model for annoyed investors.
March 22, 2009 - 7:49 pm
Steve -
Thanks for the comments… Yes, the linking features in Evernote were lost when they went to version 3. Internote linking, and linking into Evernote from external apps were both lost features. If you scan the Evernote forums you’ll find many posts where people are demanding to have these features returned, and many promises from the development team to deliver them in a future release. Hopefully that comes soon because it makes the app far less useful for me as well. You are also correct on the OneNote links. The onenote:// protocol is not widely recognized, especially by non-Microsoft apps. One awkward workaround is to copy the link, type WIN+R to open the Run dialog box, then paste the link.
The other disturbing thing is that Evernote recently disabled local image indexing (text recognition) in the Windows client. If you want your images indexed, you are stuck putting them up in the cloud via a network notebook. They also added advertisements in the free version. I guess I can understand why they had to do that, although it’s a bit obnoxious that they pitched the ads as an exciting new feature. They could have just explained that it’s a necessary part of their business model. Well, I guess the (free) honeymoon is over.
-Carl
March 24, 2009 - 3:25 am
Does anyone have thoughts on sharing/online publishing capabilities between the two? Online collaboration?
March 24, 2009 - 9:24 pm
It was only two posts back(less than a few days) that I worried that even though I liked evernote ( given a linking feature returned), I was worried that their on the intenet biz model would be an issue – and today I received mail from them, stuck in the middle of all the new features ( very few really) they mention – oh yea – all versions, including win desktop version now has ads. You can only get rid of them by- not buying evernote (cause you can’t buy it) but by signing up for the monthly service. This to me is doubly sneaky – within a short period of time of making even desktop apps be attached to the cloud ( ” for better server image recognition”) they add ads – so the real reason they made evernote be on the net ( the cloud in hip terms) is to own your desktop space and stick ads there – I call foul. MS might be evil at times but at least I own my copy with no tentacles to a changing biz model and hooks on my desktop space.
MHO of course – but this is more evil than I worried about just days OK
March 25, 2009 - 7:53 am
kowsmic – Online sharing and publishing definitely goes to Evernote. They don’t have an actual collaboration method yet (allowing multiple authors), but publishing a page to the public is drag & drop. For OneNote, you would have to export to HTML and publish yourself, or purchase some sort of enterprise software from Microsoft.
Steve – This move is definitely causing a big stink on the Evernote forums. Although I like all of the online capabilities, I also prefer to pay once for my apps, and maybe once more for major upgrades (~5 year intervals). I really wish they’d consider an option to buy an “offline” version of the app with a one-time payment that disables the ads and re-enables the image indexing.
-Carl
April 15, 2009 - 6:19 pm
Thank you for your detailed comparison. I love OneNote, and we use it one more way that I didn’t find mentioned here, and don’t know if EverNote provides: SHARED. We have our primary notebook set up on a server. My entire staff and I have access to it, and use it for shared “how-to’s” reference material, screen shots etc. It’s easy to use, and updates everyone’s copy within a few seconds of adding content on one PC. When you take your laptop home, you still have the notebook copy local, and it synchronizes changes seamlessly when you return. This is priceless for us! No publishing needed, just create the notebook as a shared notebook and place in shared location.
April 16, 2009 - 5:44 am
Hi Barbara – Today in Evernote you can’t do a fully shared notebook that allows team collaboration. This feature has been discussed on their forums, but there is no hard time line yet. Today with Evernote you can publish notebooks and make them public (or semi-public), but the only way to actually collaborate would be for everyone to use the same account/login.
-Carl
April 29, 2009 - 9:46 am
I have used both programs, but Evernote is the one I continue to use, because it is far easier for someone like me who is busy with many things. I find OneNote to be too structured. I get bogged down in the text boxes and tabs. I don’t want to spend all that time with care and feeding of an organizational structure. I prefer a fast incremental search capability, at which Evernote excels, and I don’t use handwriting recognition. Basically, I just want it to remember random bits of info like passwords and emails that I know I will lose if I try to keep them in Outlook. Evernote is perfect for this, and it doesn’t force you to pick which tab to put them in. It just captures them and makes them visible when you search for them. Period. That’s all I need and want it to do, and it does it very well indeed. I am up to version 3.x of Evernote, and the decisive advantage of this is that I can see my notes from ANYWHERE, home (any of three computers there), work, or on the road. And this is automatic. Also, a unique email address allows me to forward anything I can email to my evernote file. This is huge. I don’t know if OneNote has anything that could offset an advantage like this. And, strangely enough, it’s free. I’ve never been tempted to pay for the extras, because I just don’t need them.
April 29, 2009 - 8:21 pm
I’ve recently switched from Info Select to Evernote — I love it.
I was impressed with One Note but it lost out because:
1. I’d need to purchase 2 One Note licences for my 3 PCs.
2. The desire for no hassle synchronizing between those 3 machines. With Evernote it’s a no-brainer.
3. Can use Evernote (online only) with Linux.
4. I can access my data from any online PC anywhere.
I’m so pleased with Evernote V3 that I paid for the full version. Now I can add my Word, Excel, etc documents and they’re automatically synched as well. Heaven!
My experience here.
There are some improvements I’d like to see, but this is new software. Give it a couple of years it’ll be another Google.
May 4, 2009 - 9:29 pm
Walt, Alan – I agree. I wish OneNote had a basic notes list ala Evernote. You can sort by date, title, etc. The closest OneNote comes is a long list of tabs which cannot be sorted. The online synchronization is also fantastic. The search, however, seems to be getting slower in Evernote, and even switching notebooks for me takes a very long time. I am currently using Evernote, however, and haven’t opened OneNote in about 6 months.
One of the biggest issues right now for Evernote is that they no longer have Google Desktop Search working in Evernote 3.0. Having no desktop search capability is (almost) deal-breaker for me. OneNote is indexed by WDS, but none of the search apps can currently index EN3
-Carl
May 9, 2009 - 1:33 pm
i’m very glad i found your site and this discussion. i started using EN again recently (my first try was when it was in beta, but i gave it up) and was about to upgrade to deluxe, so i could upload .doc files, etc. now that i’ve read this discussion, i’m a little worried. it does seem as if their corporate mindset has changed a little. and since i use google desktop constantly, the lack of integration and lack of GD searchability may well be a deal-breaker.
the other big lack from my standpoint is sharing. i was hoping to use EN to share forms, info, etc., with the staff at my primary care medical office in marin, but not giving everyone the same username and password (with the possibility of a disgruntled employee having the ability to wipe out everything) is a deal-breaker.
i may stick w/ EN free for a while, but if EN premium offered the above features, i’d upgrade in a minute. heck, even if they offered features “a la carte” i’d buy some.
one note sounds interesting, but i’m really averse to using micro$oft stuff if there’s a reasonable alternative . . .
May 11, 2009 - 5:54 am
Flash – Thanks for your comments. I agree, the desktop search is a deal breaker. Hopefully they fix it soon, but it’s been promised for a while. On sharing, you can share notes by publishing them (and link remains private unless you decide to share it). The part that’s not there is collaboration with multiple editors. Not sure if that suits your needs or not.
-Carl
May 14, 2009 - 11:18 am
Carl, and all contributors:
Thank you so much for this comparison and the ensuing discussion. I am very new to both products, and am trying to pick one. All of the points made have given me a lot to think about. Right now EverNote wins because I can access it on my Blackberry. But I LOVE the OneNote feature of being able to highlight some text, tag it as “To Do” and search on “To Do” items. (I don’t use Outlook) I would love the ability to highlight sections of text in EverNote and mark it as “To Do”. Does anyone know if this is possible?
Thanks!
Laura
May 15, 2009 - 1:39 pm
Hi Laura -
Evernote does support To-Do items. You can insert one in a note by right clicking and selecting “Insert Checkbox” under the “To-Do” context menu. You can also use Alt-LeftClick with the mouse or CTRL-SHIFT-c on the keyboard to insert a to-do box. If you have a long list of To-Do items to enter, use CTRL-ENTER after the first one to move to the next line and start another To-Do item.
Once you have To-Do items scattered across your notes collection (or neatly organized within your notes collection), you can quickly find them all with a custom search. For example, you can create a “saved search” to find all incomplete (unchecked) To-Do items with the search criteria of “todo:false”.
OneNote does have the advantage of synchronizing To-Dos with Outlook Tasks, but as I mentioned in this post, the linkage can be a little unreliable.
Hope that helps.
-Carl
May 19, 2009 - 6:40 am
Carl,
Thanks so much! For some reason, I can’t get the keyboard shortcuts to work in any of my browsers (IE, FF, Chrome), but I don’t care. I hadn’t seen the “checkbox” item in the editor. Now that I know about it and know how to search on open “To Do” items, I am all set.
Brilliant!
Laura
May 19, 2009 - 11:01 am
Laura -
I didn’t realize you were using the web version… The keyboard shortcuts only work in the PC client version. The Mac client probably has similar keyboard shortcuts. The keyboard shortcut for a given command will be listed on the context menu when you right-click.
-Carl